Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants



Navigation

Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road
Kenley
Surrey
CR8 5NH

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
E-mail: fire@lwf.co.uk

Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Gaseous System Configuration - Part 10

Posted by LWF: 05/07/2018 14:44

In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking at those systems designed for fire suppression. In part 9 an introduction to gaseous systems was made and in part 10, gaseous system configuration will be discussed.

A gaseous system is a fire suppression method which involves the active agent being released from containers into a distribution pipework. The system may comprise one or more containers which can be made operational by an electrical signal, pneumatically or manually. 

The distribution pipework is usually kept empty and is made of steel. Nozzles are mounted at appropriate intervals which allow the agent to be distributed in a uniform fashion upon discharge. Release from each nozzle will usually happen simultaneously.

While a small, one-canister system may be pre-engineered with no flow calculations or nozzle sizing necessary, most systems are engineered for purpose to take into account distribution and discharge duration.

The container valves are designed to be opened by a separate actuation system, most commonly this would be an automatic system, the purpose of which is to detect fire and activate the gaseous system.  The detection system will also be able to trigger the fire alarms and shutdown any plant or equipment which might provide sources of ignition or fuel to further the fire. A manual release will also be included.

The element of the system which deals with fire detection should be designed to be in line with current British Standards. Typically, this would mean each hazard area including two zones of smoke detectors which are arranged so that the first detector would sound an alarm and two detectors would sound ‘pre-discharge’ alarms. The two-detector alarm would also trigger the commencement of a timer countdown which was set to suit the necessary evacuation time required. As the timer completes, a distinctive discharge alarm would sound and at the end of the ‘pre-discharge’ alarm, the gaseous agent would be activated and released.

Alternatively, a total flooding system may be used. This comprises a gaseous release system which is contained within an enclosure of reasonable integrity to avoid the escaping of the gas into other areas. Upon release, the gas is contained within the area to build up and maintain sufficient fire extinguishing concentration throughout the area and for a sufficient amount of time to allow the extinguishing of the fire and to allow potential sources of re-ignition time to cool. 

The halon replacement gaseous clean agents are considered suitable for surface fire hazards, whereas only CO2 has design criteria and standards for deep-seated fire risks. 

In cases where a local application system is used for hazards which are small in relation to the surrounding area, the gas is only applied to the hazard itself. In this situation, the halon-alternative gaseous clean agents are unsuitable and only CO2 has the necessary design criteria and standards.

In part 11 of this series, LWF will look at the agents used for gaseous systems. In the meantime, if you have any questions about this blog, or wish to discuss your own project with one of our fire engineers, please contact us.

Lawrence Webster Forrest has been working with their clients for over 25 years to produce innovative and exciting building projects. If you would like further information on how LWF and fire strategies could assist you, please contact Peter Gyere on 020 8668 8663.

While care has been taken to ensure that information contained in LWF's publications is true and correct at the time of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of this information.

Leave a reply

  *

  *

 


CAPTCHA Image

[ Change the image ]


*Required

Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Bulletins
Email Format
* indicates required

FIRE SAFETY BLOGS

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 27

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking at fire safety engineering. In part 26, we looked at how the choice of fire hydrant can affect the efficiency of delivery and by working out the additional time required to prime an underground hydrant when compared to a pillar hydrant with instantaneous couplings, it was established there could be as much as 2 minutes delay...

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Venting of Basements - Part 61

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 60 of this series, the placement of fire hydrants in relation to hospital buildings was discussed. In part 61, we will look at the effects of smoke on basement levels and the use of venting.A fire which starts in a basement or involves a basement level causes...

    Read more...

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Insurers & Property Protection - Part 8

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at the part Insurers have played in property protection over the years. In part 7, we discussed the role the FOC played in producing rules and regulations not only for building standards but also for fire protection products. In part 8, we will continue looking at the impact of...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 26

    In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and other interested parties in the building design business, we have been looking at firefighting. In part 25, we looked at how hydrants should be located in relation to the building perimeter and the likely position of a Fire Service pump upon attending a fire at the premises. In part 26, we continue looking at location and also the type of hydrant provided in relation to the...

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Fire Mains - Part 60

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 59 of this series, LWF discussed the requirements for healthcare buildings with a hospital street and which do not require a fire-fighting shaft. In part 60, we will look at the provision of fire mains.Fire mains must be provided in every firefighting shaft, or in some instances,...

    Read more...

Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London