Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants


Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583

Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Gaseous System Configuration - Part 10

Posted by LWF: 05/07/2018 14:44

In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking at those systems designed for fire suppression. In part 9 an introduction to gaseous systems was made and in part 10, gaseous system configuration will be discussed.

A gaseous system is a fire suppression method which involves the active agent being released from containers into a distribution pipework. The system may comprise one or more containers which can be made operational by an electrical signal, pneumatically or manually. 

The distribution pipework is usually kept empty and is made of steel. Nozzles are mounted at appropriate intervals which allow the agent to be distributed in a uniform fashion upon discharge. Release from each nozzle will usually happen simultaneously.

While a small, one-canister system may be pre-engineered with no flow calculations or nozzle sizing necessary, most systems are engineered for purpose to take into account distribution and discharge duration.

The container valves are designed to be opened by a separate actuation system, most commonly this would be an automatic system, the purpose of which is to detect fire and activate the gaseous system.  The detection system will also be able to trigger the fire alarms and shutdown any plant or equipment which might provide sources of ignition or fuel to further the fire. A manual release will also be included.

The element of the system which deals with fire detection should be designed to be in line with current British Standards. Typically, this would mean each hazard area including two zones of smoke detectors which are arranged so that the first detector would sound an alarm and two detectors would sound ‘pre-discharge’ alarms. The two-detector alarm would also trigger the commencement of a timer countdown which was set to suit the necessary evacuation time required. As the timer completes, a distinctive discharge alarm would sound and at the end of the ‘pre-discharge’ alarm, the gaseous agent would be activated and released.

Alternatively, a total flooding system may be used. This comprises a gaseous release system which is contained within an enclosure of reasonable integrity to avoid the escaping of the gas into other areas. Upon release, the gas is contained within the area to build up and maintain sufficient fire extinguishing concentration throughout the area and for a sufficient amount of time to allow the extinguishing of the fire and to allow potential sources of re-ignition time to cool. 

The halon replacement gaseous clean agents are considered suitable for surface fire hazards, whereas only CO2 has design criteria and standards for deep-seated fire risks. 

In cases where a local application system is used for hazards which are small in relation to the surrounding area, the gas is only applied to the hazard itself. In this situation, the halon-alternative gaseous clean agents are unsuitable and only CO2 has the necessary design criteria and standards.

In part 11 of this series, LWF will look at the agents used for gaseous systems. In the meantime, if you have any questions about this blog, or wish to discuss your own project with one of our fire engineers, please contact us.

Lawrence Webster Forrest has been working with their clients for over 25 years to produce innovative and exciting building projects. If you would like further information on how LWF and fire strategies could assist you, please contact Peter Gyere on 020 8668 8663.

While care has been taken to ensure that information contained in LWF's publications is true and correct at the time of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of this information.

Leave a reply





[ Change the image ]


Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Email Format
* indicates required


  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Compartmentation & Life Safety - Part 5

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering blog series for Architects and others working in the building design business, we have been discussing compartmentation. In part 4 of this series, the ways in which compartmentation supports life safety functions in a fire situation were summarised. In part 5, we look at the ways the issue of compartmentation and life safety is covered in the national building regulations, before looking at the spread of fire. 


  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Compartmentation & Fire Hazard Rooms and Areas - Part 39

    In LWF’s blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 38 of this series, the importance of fire stopping the joints between fire separating elements such as walls and any openings was discussed. In part 39, we will continue in that area by looking at fire hazard rooms and areas.While most types of buildings require the protection...


  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Content of Fire Training - Part 13

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management, or who have an interest in or responsibility for Fire Safety, we have been looking at the necessity for staff training and fire drills. In part 12 we looked at the implications of committing to fire safety training in a business or organisation in terms of time commitment. In part 13, the necessary content of the fire safety training sessions is outlined. All comprehensive...


  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Maintenance of Compartmentation - Part 4

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering blogs for Architects and others who work in the building design business, we have been looking at compartmentation of buildings to avoid fire spread from the compartment of fire origin to any other area. In part 3 of this series, the fire-resisting performance of elements which go into comprising a fire-resistant compartment was discussed. In part 4, we discuss how a compartment’s integrity is only as good as its ongoing maintenance,...


  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Staff Training & Fire Drills - Part 12

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management, or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at staff training and fire drills. In part 11 of this series, methods of training were discussed and in part 12, we will continue from that point to discuss the practicalities of who should receive training and how it should be organised.Adequate fire training should be given to...


Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London