Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants



Navigation

Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road
Kenley
Surrey
CR8 5NH

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
E-mail: fire@lwf.co.uk

Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Achieving Fire Safety Standards - Part 21

Posted by LWF: 08/06/2017 11:17

In this fire engineering design and risk assessment blog series for Architects and others working in building design, we have been recently covering fire and smoke ventilation and the fire engineering design. In Part 20, we looked at the issues to be addressed by the design team and in Part 21, we will continue by looking at the areas to be considered when analysing and making judgements on the design of fire engineering systems to achieve a cost-effective and adequately safe solution.

Although it would be very difficult to establish exact figures for fire and smoke potential in case of a fire, it is important that best estimates are made which include all contingencies and no unknown areas of redundancy. This enables a judgement to be made on the margin of safety and to determine the requirement for system diversity and reliability.

In cases where the system design is non-sensitive and clear definitions are in place for failsafe modes, there will be little or no need for a margin of safety. Use of this strategy requires that even substantial changes to fire size or hazard result in only small changes to the system design.

One example of such a system would be where the aim is to keep smoke temperature below a certain level. A natural ventilation system would be much less sensitive to changes in fire size than a mechanical ventilation system. However, a mechanical system is a more reliable means of maintaining a clear layer in cases of non-buoyant smoke.

While examples can be seen as ‘typical’, it does not mean that they apply to every situation and the judgements made must be based only on that particular design and design criteria. It is therefore essential that the output sensitivity relative to changes in input must be understood and taken into account.

The smoke control activation method needs consideration and thought to ensure that it will operate without unusual delay - incorporating transport time, dilution and thermal lag – as the design indicates.

It is worth noting that various fire disasters have been ascribed to the failure of control, as well as building performance. While the persons designing the building’s fire engineering provision cannot be expected to have an impact upon how the building is controlled when in use, they can use an understanding of the management requirements and ensure that that the design and maintenance requirements are clearly and reliably reported to the client.

In Part 22 of this series, we will be looking at ‘hot smoke tests’ which are commonly used in Australia and, although there is no requirement to do so, on occasion in the UK. In the meantime, if you have any questions about this blog, or wish to discuss your own project with one of our fire engineers, please contact us.

Lawrence Webster Forrest has been working with their clients for over 25 years to produce innovative and exciting building projects. If you would like further information on how LWF and fire strategies could assist you, please contact Peter Gyere on 020 8668 8663.

Leave a reply

  *

  *

 


CAPTCHA Image

[ Change the image ]


*Required

Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Bulletins
Email Format
* indicates required

FIRE SAFETY BLOGS

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Smoke Control - Part 3

    In LWF’s fire safety blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking recently at smoke control in buildings. In Part 2, we talked about how the spread of smoke can not only cause danger to those people trying to evacuate the building, but can also damage the building and contents extensively. In Part 3, we will begin to look...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Sprinkler Heads - Part 17

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment blog series for architects and others in the building design business, we are talking about sprinkler systems. In part 16, we looked at hazard classifications for sprinkler system design, in part 17, we’re going to discuss sprinkler heads.Sprinkler heads are an important part of a sprinkler system and the most visible part to building occupants. Although sprinkler head design differs depending upon requirements, the majority act...

    Read more...

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Smoke Control - Part 2

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety in buildings, we have been looking at smoke control and its importance in terms of successful evacuation of the building and levels of damage to the building and contents. In Part 2, we will continue looking at the potential for smoke damage before exploring how smoke moves and spreads.The ‘man on the...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Hazard Classifications - Part 16

    In LWF’s fire engineering and risk assessment blog series for architects and those working in the business of building design, we have been looking at hazard classification of risks in relation to sprinkler installations. In Part 15, the nature of high hazard risks was outlined along with the extreme consequences should a fire occur in a high hazard risk building. It was ascertained that sprinkler protection must be designed specifically for the risk. In Part...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Hazard Classifications - Part 15

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment blog series for Architects and others involved in building design, we have been looking recently at sprinkler protection and the hazard classifications which exist to indicate the type of risk with which the sprinkler must cope. In Part 14, we discussed Light Hazard risks and began to talk about Ordinary Hazard risks, Part 15 will continue from that point.While it is not always possible to wholly...

    Read more...

Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London