Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants



Navigation

Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road
Kenley
Surrey
CR8 5NH

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
E-mail: fire@lwf.co.uk

Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Achieving Fire Safety Standards - Part 21

Posted by LWF: 08/06/2017 11:17

In this fire engineering design and risk assessment blog series for Architects and others working in building design, we have been recently covering fire and smoke ventilation and the fire engineering design. In Part 20, we looked at the issues to be addressed by the design team and in Part 21, we will continue by looking at the areas to be considered when analysing and making judgements on the design of fire engineering systems to achieve a cost-effective and adequately safe solution.

Although it would be very difficult to establish exact figures for fire and smoke potential in case of a fire, it is important that best estimates are made which include all contingencies and no unknown areas of redundancy. This enables a judgement to be made on the margin of safety and to determine the requirement for system diversity and reliability.

In cases where the system design is non-sensitive and clear definitions are in place for failsafe modes, there will be little or no need for a margin of safety. Use of this strategy requires that even substantial changes to fire size or hazard result in only small changes to the system design.

One example of such a system would be where the aim is to keep smoke temperature below a certain level. A natural ventilation system would be much less sensitive to changes in fire size than a mechanical ventilation system. However, a mechanical system is a more reliable means of maintaining a clear layer in cases of non-buoyant smoke.

While examples can be seen as ‘typical’, it does not mean that they apply to every situation and the judgements made must be based only on that particular design and design criteria. It is therefore essential that the output sensitivity relative to changes in input must be understood and taken into account.

The smoke control activation method needs consideration and thought to ensure that it will operate without unusual delay - incorporating transport time, dilution and thermal lag – as the design indicates.

It is worth noting that various fire disasters have been ascribed to the failure of control, as well as building performance. While the persons designing the building’s fire engineering provision cannot be expected to have an impact upon how the building is controlled when in use, they can use an understanding of the management requirements and ensure that that the design and maintenance requirements are clearly and reliably reported to the client.

In Part 22 of this series, we will be looking at ‘hot smoke tests’ which are commonly used in Australia and, although there is no requirement to do so, on occasion in the UK. In the meantime, if you have any questions about this blog, or wish to discuss your own project with one of our fire engineers, please contact us.

Lawrence Webster Forrest has been working with their clients for over 25 years to produce innovative and exciting building projects. If you would like further information on how LWF and fire strategies could assist you, please contact Peter Gyere on 020 8668 8663.

Leave a reply

  *

  *

 


CAPTCHA Image

[ Change the image ]


*Required

Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Bulletins
Email Format
* indicates required

FIRE SAFETY BLOGS

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Fire & Rescue Service Facilities - Part 5

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at the facilities required by the Fire and Rescue Service in case of a fire at your premises. As has been established in the previous parts of this series, many of these provisions are physical and should be taken into account when the building is at the design and...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Sprinkler System Installations - Part 25

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design industry, we have been looking at the use of sprinklers as part of active fire protection. In Part 24, the types of sprinkler system were considered, including wet, alternate and dry installations. Part 25 will continue from that point and cover tail-end alternate and tail-end dry systems and pre-action installations.While it is most common for outside temperatures to affect a...

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - The Basic Principles - Part 1

    Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF) is a provider of Fire Engineering services and producer of informational resources on the subject of Fire Safety for organisations and companies. Fire Safety for Healthcare premises is a blog series aiming to give guidance on healthcare-based standards and best practice in fire safety and will refer to and draw from sources such as the HTM documents, building regulations, Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and other relevant regulations and standards. 

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Sprinkler System Installations - Part 24

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking recently at Sprinkler Systems. In Part 23, we discussed methods of water delivery to the sprinkler heads and ascertained that ‘wet installations’ were the most commonly used type of sprinkler system, meaning that the system is constantly charged with water, ready for operation. In Part 24, we will give an overview of alternate wet and dry...

    Read more...

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Fire & Rescue Service Facilities - Part 4

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for Fire Safety, we have recently been discussing the nature of the responsibilities held by a building owner in regard to accessibility for the Fire Service. It was established that along with responsibilities to make relevant information available to the Fire Service and make the property available for familiarisation visits, there are some key elements which...

    Read more...

Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London