Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants


Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583

Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Achieving Fire Safety Standards - Part 21

Posted by LWF: 08/06/2017 11:17

In this fire engineering design and risk assessment blog series for Architects and others working in building design, we have been recently covering fire and smoke ventilation and the fire engineering design. In Part 20, we looked at the issues to be addressed by the design team and in Part 21, we will continue by looking at the areas to be considered when analysing and making judgements on the design of fire engineering systems to achieve a cost-effective and adequately safe solution.

Although it would be very difficult to establish exact figures for fire and smoke potential in case of a fire, it is important that best estimates are made which include all contingencies and no unknown areas of redundancy. This enables a judgement to be made on the margin of safety and to determine the requirement for system diversity and reliability.

In cases where the system design is non-sensitive and clear definitions are in place for failsafe modes, there will be little or no need for a margin of safety. Use of this strategy requires that even substantial changes to fire size or hazard result in only small changes to the system design.

One example of such a system would be where the aim is to keep smoke temperature below a certain level. A natural ventilation system would be much less sensitive to changes in fire size than a mechanical ventilation system. However, a mechanical system is a more reliable means of maintaining a clear layer in cases of non-buoyant smoke.

While examples can be seen as ‘typical’, it does not mean that they apply to every situation and the judgements made must be based only on that particular design and design criteria. It is therefore essential that the output sensitivity relative to changes in input must be understood and taken into account.

The smoke control activation method needs consideration and thought to ensure that it will operate without unusual delay - incorporating transport time, dilution and thermal lag – as the design indicates.

It is worth noting that various fire disasters have been ascribed to the failure of control, as well as building performance. While the persons designing the building’s fire engineering provision cannot be expected to have an impact upon how the building is controlled when in use, they can use an understanding of the management requirements and ensure that that the design and maintenance requirements are clearly and reliably reported to the client.

In Part 22 of this series, we will be looking at ‘hot smoke tests’ which are commonly used in Australia and, although there is no requirement to do so, on occasion in the UK. In the meantime, if you have any questions about this blog, or wish to discuss your own project with one of our fire engineers, please contact us.

Lawrence Webster Forrest has been working with their clients for over 25 years to produce innovative and exciting building projects. If you would like further information on how LWF and fire strategies could assist you, please contact Peter Gyere on 020 8668 8663.

Leave a reply





[ Change the image ]


Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Email Format
* indicates required


  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Smoke Management System Components - Part 23

    In this Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment blog series for Architects and others involved in building design, we have been looking at fire and smoke ventilation. In the last blog, Part 22, we talked about the use of hot smoke tests in some parts of the world and how they can be carried out without damaging the premises in question.  In Part 23, we are going to look at the components of smoke management...


  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Locating Sprinkler Heads - Part 13

    In this blog series for those who work in Facilities Management and who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at fixed fire-fighting systems. A sprinkler system design is usually as individual as the building which contains it. In part 13, we will look at how sprinkler heads should be located.In the vast majority of cases, if a sprinkler system is present in a building it should be...


  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Sprinkler System Heads & Heat - Part 12

    In this blog series for those who work in Facilities Management and who have a responsibility for or interest in fire safety, we have been looking at how sprinklers operate in buildings and in Part 11, we began to look at sprinkler heads. In Part 12, we’re going to discuss the effect of temperature on the operation and design of sprinkler heads and how the choice of the most appropriate type of sprinkler head can...


  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Hot Smoke Tests - Part 22

    In this blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking at fire and smoke ventilation. In Part 21 of the series, we talked about the reliability and performance of a given design. In this blog we will give an overview of Hot Smoke Tests and how they are used.There is currently no requirement for hot smoke tests in the UK and although their use has been touched...


  • Grenfell Tower fire

    LWF have received a number of enquiries from the media following this morning’s terrible fire at Grenfell Tower. There are a number of factors that may have contributed to the rapid fire spread witnessed in the early hours of this morning and potentially a number of combinations of these factors are possible. There is insufficient information available at this time from which to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the cause and development of this fire. Historically, major...


Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London