Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants



Navigation

Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road
Kenley
Surrey
CR8 5NH

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
E-mail: fire@lwf.co.uk

Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Fire Safety Engineering & the Prescriptive Approach - Part 4

Posted by LWF: 08/11/2018 11:07

LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety has been looking at the ideas behind fire safety engineering. In part 3, we looked at how the prescriptive approach was the one demanded by insurers until relatively recently when a more flexible approach was approved. In part 4, we will look at what is good about the prescriptive approach, as an alternative to fire engineered solutions.

While prescriptive methods of fire safety are used less frequently than in the past, in favour of an individually designed fire safety engineered solution, prescriptive approaches can provide a successful approach and in some circumstances, may be the best approach to a project. 

The rules of prescriptive fire safety are straightforward and allow a consistent approach.  It requires less complex understanding and assessment by enforcing authorities and therefore can often make for an easier process for the design team. The traditional way offers less risk in terms of liability and in terms of the potential for harm to any building occupants. This is not to say that prescriptive solutions are safer in and of themselves – a well-designed fire engineered solution can be safer, simply that a tried and tested method involves less risk, or at least, less risk-assessment.

It also follows, therefore, that a fire officer or insurance surveyor who has limited training in technical issues and no engineering qualification could more easily understand a prescriptive solution than a fire safety engineered one.
Many guides are based solely on prescriptive solutions and this is largely because the individual elements can be considered in isolation from each other with only minimal crossover between areas. For instance, when discussing travel distances to evacuate a building, prescriptive distances are easily quoted and do not have to be related often to other fire safety or fire prevention provision within the building. A fire engineered approach may sweep aside traditional travel distances because other facilities are in place, such as sprinklers or smoke extraction systems. A fire engineered solution should be particular and individual to the project in hand, whereas prescriptive figures can be compared across projects and buildings.

The vast majority of buildings are still designed as per prescriptive codes and most building work in terms of modification of existing buildings also follows those codes. This is not to say that fire engineers may not be involved with projects which are purely prescriptive in nature, they frequently are.

In part 5 of this series, LWF will look at some of the criticism of the prescriptive approach that has been heard in the last twenty or thirty years. In the meantime, if you have any queries about your own facilities or wish to discuss this blog series, please contact Peter Gyere in the first instance on 0208 668 8663.

Lawrence Webster Forrest is a fire engineering consultancy based in Surrey with over 25 years' experience, which provides a wide range of consultancy services to professionals involved in the design, development and construction and operation of buildings. 

While care has been taken to ensure that information contained in LWF's publications is true and correct at the time of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of this information.

Leave a reply

  *

  *

 


CAPTCHA Image

[ Change the image ]


*Required

Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Bulletins
Email Format
* indicates required

FIRE SAFETY BLOGS

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 22

    In LWFs fire engineering blog series for Architects and others involved in building design, we have been looking at the subject of firefighting. In part 21, the issue of whether a building needs to supply a source of water for the Fire Service to use upon attending a fire was discussed. In part 22, we continue looking at the regulations dealing with water hydrants.In the UK, BS 5306:1 was published in 1976 (and withdrawn...

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Access & Facilities for the Fire Service - Part 56

    In LWF’s blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 55 of this series, we began looking at the importance of access by road for the Fire Service and which entrances should be used for their access. In part 56, LWF will continue looking at those measures which should be taken to ensure the Fire Service has access...

    Read more...

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Fire Safety Objectives - Part 3

    In LWFs blog series for those who work in Facilities Management, or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at property protection and the insurer. In part 2, it was ascertained that while there is a legal requirement for buildings to be fire safe in order to ensure the safe evacuation of the building occupants, there is no legal requirement for precautions which are designed for the protection...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 21

    In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and others involved in building design we have been looking at firefighting. In part 20, an outline of how the water carried by a fire engine is used with the hoses to provide a limited time supply of water to fight a fire. In part 21, we continue from that point.As a fire engine can only carry a limited amount of water, a large fire will...

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Access & Facilities for the Fire Service - Part 55

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 54 of this series, we finished our discussion on ventilation for car parks as part of healthcare buildings. In part 55, we move on to look at the provision of access and facilities for the Fire Service both in terms of general requirements and those particular to healthcare...

    Read more...

Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London