Lawrence Webster Forrest
Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
Lawrence Webster Forrest
Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
Water Mist Fire Protection in the UK
The use of water mist systems in the UK has increased over the last decade due to a number of reasons, the advantages being:
However when it comes to the approval stage of a water mist system installation a common problem that both the approvals authority and the consulting engineer encounter, is that there is a definite lack of robust design and installation standards.
Therefore the purpose of this bulletin is to discuss the considerations that should be given to the specification of water mist systems.
What is Water Mist?
A water mist fire protection system is a fixed active fire protection system that discharges a fine spray of small water droplets. The water droplets discharged from a water mist system removes the heat from the fire (cooling of fire plume and wetting/cooling of the fuel surface), displaces oxygen and dilutes the fuel vapour from the fire, resulting in fire suppression or extinguishment. The term ‘water mist’ refers to fine water sprays in which the drop diameter, (DV0,90) is less than 1mm measured in a plane 1m from the nozzle at its minimum operating pressure.
Sprinkler Systems Vs Water Mist Systems
The application of sprinkler systems is largely understood and there are historic performance records for buildings. Sprinkler systems have standards and approvals for the components and the design and installation. For these reasons sprinkler systems are accepted as automatic fire suppression systems in the current Building Regulations in the UK.
A frequently asked question from building control professionals and fire safety officers is whether a water mist system can achieve an equivalent level of performance compared to a sprinkler system. Unfortunately, there is no straight answer to this, as water mist systems are not designed in the same way as sprinkler systems. The use of water mist systems for volume protection in buildings is largely unproven. To date there appears to be very few reported fire events in buildings with water mist systems. As the water droplets produced by a water mist system are smaller than for sprinklers it is considered that a significant amount of the water mist droplets can be ‘blown away’ under certain conditions such as open doors or windows. As a result, the water coverage flux density at the fire location is reduced by ventilation. However, there is also empirical test evidence available showing that within a small compartment, water mist performed well in a fully sealed enclosure.
Ventilation and compartment sizes are merely two examples out of many critical design details that can affect the successful operation of a water mist system. In order to use water mist systems as an alternative to sprinkler systems it is a requirement within the Building Regulations that such systems have been designed and tested for use in buildings and are fit for their intended purpose.
Currently there is no published British Standard for water mist systems or water mist system components. Existing water mist standards such as the published National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 750 Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems or International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Standards are not directly applicable to UK land-based applications. A European water mist (Technical Specification CEN TS 14972) has been published which includes a fire performance test for various applications. However this document has not been adopted in the UK and its suitability for UK application is uncertain.
Two new Drafts for Development have now been issued:
There is currently insufficient technical data available for them to be published as full British Standards. These documents try to define the testing protocols for water mist systems in various different applications, however, they do not cover all water mist scenarios. It is anticipated that tests for further applications will be developed in due course and published in additional sections, as the specification for fire performance tests is developed for other uses.
Due to the limitation of guidance on water mist systems, extra care should be taken when choosing a water mist system for buildings in the UK.
Acceptability of Water Mist Systems
In the absence of a generalised design and installation standard (such as BS 5306 Part 2: Fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises – Specification for sprinkler systems or BS EN 12845: Fixed firefighting systems – Automatic sprinkler systems – Design, installation and maintenance), the acceptability of water mist system installations for buildings will depend on the demonstration of their effectiveness in a suitable fire performance test relevant to the real life application. To choose an acceptable water mist system, it is imperative that relevant supporting evidence be made available by the supplier or installer, demonstrating that test fires have been satisfactorily extinguished, suppressed or controlled (whichever is the desired result from the system) in rooms of the same size and same occupancy with an equivalent fire load as the intended application. In other words, water mist systems for buildings should be considered on a case-by-case basis to determine whether a proposed system has met the fire protection objectives.
As water mist does not primarily extinguish by direct wetting of solid fuels, its impact on, for example, deep-seated fires will be slow. Other scenarios where water mist may not be able to extinguish fires include small fires and shielded fires. For this reason, the fire protection objectives for a water mist system need to be clearly stated by the supplier or installer with supporting evidence, so that the building control professionals and fire safety officers can make a judgement about the acceptability of water mist systems. The fire protection objective terms for a water mist system are defined as:
Fire extinguishment: A sharp reduction in heat release rate leading to complete elimination of any flaming or smouldering fire;
Fire suppression: A steady reduction in the heat release rate resulting in a lower controlled level of burning;
Fire control: Limitation of fire growth and protection of structure (by cooling of the objects, fire gases and/or by pre-wetting adjacent combustibles)
The following is a brief ‘Water Mist Checklist’ suggested by London Fire Brigade (LFB), which they use for reviewing the acceptability of a proposal when submitted to them for approval:
As mentioned, supporting evidence should be made available to demonstrate that water mist systems are fit for purpose. To meet this requirement fire tests are generally used in the industry. As an alternative method to fire tests, using mathematical modelling e.g. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) may also be utilised to demonstrate the performance of a water mist system subject to that a particular numerical model used has been adequately validated for the intended water mist applications. For instance, the numerical simulation of fire extinguishment is an extremely difficult task. None of the current CFD models has been extensively validated to predict fire extinguishment and this may be the case for some years to come. Therefore, the fire protection objectives for water mist systems should be clearly identified before using mathematical modelling to demonstrate the performance of this form of suppression.
It is important that water mist systems are being designed and proved fit for purpose using suitable standards, fire demonstrations and performance tests. The use of mathematical modelling to demonstrate the performance of water mist systems is only acceptable subject to the validation of a numerical model used. Misunderstandings and lack of knowledge about water mist systems can lead to inappropriate application of these systems and therefore caution is strongly advised.
In LWF’s Fire Engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking at fire safety engineering. In part 26, we looked at how the choice of fire hydrant can affect the efficiency of delivery and by working out the additional time required to prime an underground hydrant when compared to a pillar hydrant with instantaneous couplings, it was established there could be as much as 2 minutes delay...
In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 60 of this series, the placement of fire hydrants in relation to hospital buildings was discussed. In part 61, we will look at the effects of smoke on basement levels and the use of venting.A fire which starts in a basement or involves a basement level causes...
In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at the part Insurers have played in property protection over the years. In part 7, we discussed the role the FOC played in producing rules and regulations not only for building standards but also for fire protection products. In part 8, we will continue looking at the impact of...
In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and other interested parties in the building design business, we have been looking at firefighting. In part 25, we looked at how hydrants should be located in relation to the building perimeter and the likely position of a Fire Service pump upon attending a fire at the premises. In part 26, we continue looking at location and also the type of hydrant provided in relation to the...
In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 59 of this series, LWF discussed the requirements for healthcare buildings with a hospital street and which do not require a fire-fighting shaft. In part 60, we will look at the provision of fire mains.Fire mains must be provided in every firefighting shaft, or in some instances,...
The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...
Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.Â Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...
Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...