Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants


Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583

Qualitative Design Review (QDR)

Qualitative Design Review or QDR is defined in PD 7974: 2001 as the initial stage of any engineering design in which the basic design parameters for a project are established and the scope and objectives of the fire strategy can be defined. To undertake QDR effectively can seem to be an expensive luxury during the early stages of many projects, however; it can be a very valuable exercise which can identify problems early and potentially help to reduce project cost and risk. The following bulletin discusses the formal process of QDR and why it can be a very important part of any design process.

What is QDR?

Fires scenarios in buildings are unpredictable and there are a vast number of different scenarios that could occur, far too many to feasibly evaluate every case. For a Fire Engineer the Qualitative Design Review (QDR) is the process used to identify the significant hazards and most likely scenarios so that the required level of quantified design can be established. The process is essentially the qualitative assessment of the design problem calling upon the knowledge and experience of the Fire Engineer and other design team members and building operators.

Who Should Be Involved?

The size of the QDR team will depend upon the size and complexity of the project but will typically involve one or more fire engineers, other key members of the design team and wherever possible a member of operational management. A typical QDR team for a medium/large project would include:

·         Fire Engineer

·         Architect

·         Services Engineer

·         Structural Engineer

·         Operational Management

·         Approvals Body and/or Insurer  

The intention is then that this team work systematically through the design to identify possible fire hazards and a range of possible strategies which maintain the fire risk at an acceptable level. A structured approach is recommended to reduce the risk that an item is missed or overlooked. 

 Identify Design Parameters

One of the key objectives of the QDR is to review the early architectural design and identify the design parameters. It is important for the Fire Engineer to fully understand the proposed use and functional objectives of the building as well as any significant hazards or design aspirations that will need to be accounted for in the fire safety design. Some of the parameters that should be considered are:

·         Building & Occupant Characteristics

·         Fire Safety Objectives (Life Safety and/or Property/Business Protection)

·         Hazards

·         Architectural Design

 Beyond these broader design objectives the QDR should also consider further details, such as:

·         Fire Load Densities

·         Site Conditions – Access for the Fire Service

·         Construction Type

·         Ongoing Management

·         Potential Ignition Sources

·         Consequences of a Hazard

Define Acceptance Criteria

It is important during the QDR to establish acceptance criteria for the design including any quantitative values such as tenability criteria for means of escape. This is required to allow any further assessment of a particular strategy to be completed and also allows opposing strategies to be directly compared against each other.

It is very useful at this stage if acceptance criteria can be agreed in principle with the approving authorities as this can reduce the risk of abortive works and approvals issues at a later stage in the project. 

Fire Scenarios for Analysis

Once the design parameters are understood and any acceptance criteria have been established the QDR team will generate a number of trial designs which are intended to achieve the fire safety objectives. These could simply be different ways or configurations of systems to achieve the same basic acceptance criteria or could involve different strategies and systems to meet the functional objective. An example could be the protection of a balcony escape within an atrium void. One approach could be to provide tenable conditions for escape by providing active smoke control within the atrium and this smoke control could take many different forms. Alternative approaches may be to enclose the balconies, provide alternative means of escape or remove any risk from the atrium.

Design options should not just consider the addition of fire protection systems but should also look at other ways in which hazards can be reduced or eliminated through changes to the construction or layout of a building.

It should not automatically be assumed that a fire engineered solution will be best as it may be that a prescriptive approach is more appropriate to the design. 

Methods of Analysis

Where a fire engineered solution is proposed it will invariably require some form of quantified assessment to be undertaken to show that the fire safety objectives can be achieved. There are three main forms of quantitative assessment:

·         Comparative – typically used to show that the proposed design achieves a comparable level of fire safety to that of a building that complies with prescriptive codes. Comparisons can be on either a deterministic or probabilistic basis.

·         Deterministic – Used to show that a pre-determined condition will or will not occur based upon worst case scenario assumptions.

·         Probabilistic – Used to show that the probability of an event occurring is acceptably low.

In practice most quantitative assessments will use a deterministic approach to show that the agreed acceptance criteria can be met.

Benefits of QDR

A structured approach to QDR that involves a good mix of skills and knowledge as well as representation from key stake holders will lead to an optimised design solution. Knowing that a QDR process has been undertaken provides a client with confidence in the proposals knowing that all foreseeable fire safety issues have been considered. Also undertaking QDR at an early stage in the development of a building design can significantly reduce the risks to the project both in terms of budget and achieving statutory approvals.  

This bulletin was written by Richard Sherwood BEng (Hons) Principal Fire Engineer.

Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Email Format
* indicates required


  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 27

    In LWF’s Fire Engineering blog series for Architects and others in the building design business, we have been looking at fire safety engineering. In part 26, we looked at how the choice of fire hydrant can affect the efficiency of delivery and by working out the additional time required to prime an underground hydrant when compared to a pillar hydrant with instantaneous couplings, it was established there could be as much as 2 minutes delay...


  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Venting of Basements - Part 61

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 60 of this series, the placement of fire hydrants in relation to hospital buildings was discussed. In part 61, we will look at the effects of smoke on basement levels and the use of venting.A fire which starts in a basement or involves a basement level causes...


  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Insurers & Property Protection - Part 8

    In LWF’s blog series for those who work in Facilities Management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at the part Insurers have played in property protection over the years. In part 7, we discussed the role the FOC played in producing rules and regulations not only for building standards but also for fire protection products. In part 8, we will continue looking at the impact of...


  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 26

    In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and other interested parties in the building design business, we have been looking at firefighting. In part 25, we looked at how hydrants should be located in relation to the building perimeter and the likely position of a Fire Service pump upon attending a fire at the premises. In part 26, we continue looking at location and also the type of hydrant provided in relation to the...


  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Fire Mains - Part 60

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 59 of this series, LWF discussed the requirements for healthcare buildings with a hospital street and which do not require a fire-fighting shaft. In part 60, we will look at the provision of fire mains.Fire mains must be provided in every firefighting shaft, or in some instances,...


Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London