Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants
Lawrence Webster Forrest (LWF), Fire Engineering and Fire Risk Management Consultants



Navigation

Client login
Forgotten password
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our blog

Lawrence Webster Forrest
Legion House
Lower Road
Kenley
Surrey
CR8 5NH

Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
E-mail: fire@lwf.co.uk

Fire Safety - Prioritisation of Works

When any Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) / safety assessment is made, it is inevitable that some actions will be required, unless of course perfection has been achieved.  These actions can be extremely varied from a recommendation to place an adhesive sign on a fire door, to the installation of a new fire alarm system, for example.

Whilst a standard FRA will recommend works / actions to be undertaken, it is not necessarily the norm for the risk assessment process to prioritise those works, although it is noted that some ‘natural prioritisation’ will occur based on the residual risk level that is established.

Acting on the recommendations of a fire safety inspection is likely to be the key.  All too often, people believe that undertaking an FRA is enough; however, it is acting on the findings of the assessment that reduces the residual risk to a tolerable level.  Failing to act on these recommendations is effectively failing to meet the legislative requirements.

However, as with most actions / work items, external factors have a significant influence.  Arguably, one of the most common factors is cost, although there are a number of others; lead times for contractors, ordering materials, ability to undertake works without severely compromising the ‘day to day’ running of the organisation, to name a few.  With all these factors, it is evident that a clear, prioritised programme of works is developed and whilst it can take on board these factors, life safety will always take precedence.

The current economic climate has seen budget constraints placed on the majority of commercial and public sectors, therefore this ability to prioritise has become more important than ever.  It is clear that a defined budget may be allocated to such works, and for that budget to be spent without due consideration may lead to the fire safety objectives not being met and additional expenditure required.

With this borne in mind, which works should be prioritised?  This question is fundamental and can only be answered on a bespoke basis and each recommendation should be reviewed against its risk grading.  Should the FRA find that the lack of a fire alarm system, for example, leads to a significant life safety concern, focus must be placed on this finding.  However, it is likely that the decisions will not always be this obvious.  Similarly, it is not as simple as the most expensive works will reap the greatest benefits.

On this basis, all actions must be considered and set against life safety objectives. However, with the term ‘reasonable’ within legislation, it is clear that cost can be taken into account to ensure that the right fire precautions are installed (and maintained) commensurate to the risks.  If this were not the case, the latest guidance could have introduced facilities such as sprinklers within every building and a fire station on the corner of every street, however, this is not deemed necessary to mitigate the risk posed in most buildings.

A prioritisation programme will also look at the potential for interim measures.  Should a recommendation not be feasible immediately or have a time delay due to various constraints, a detailed programme could be formulated with other fire safety measures considered as an immediate (but temporary) risk reduction measure. 

In complex buildings such as hospitals for example, the formulation of such a programme can ensure life safety objectives are maintained whilst the building remains in operation.

Where FRA actions can not be implemented immediately, these may need to be discussed and agreed with the Enforcing Authorities.  Our experience indicates that if minimum safe conditions are maintained, improvement / remedial works can be programmed in with interim measures adopted where necessary.

If you would like to know more – or would like to arrange an appointment with one of our senior fire safety advisers – simply call Peter Gyere on 020 8668 8663

Subscribe to our fire safety blogs

Bulletins
Email Format
* indicates required

FIRE SAFETY BLOGS

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 24

    In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and other professionals involved in building design, we have been looking at firefighting and, most recently, the provisions that should be made for the Fire Service to attend and put out a fire. In part 23, we looked at the requirements and recommendations relating to the provision of fire hydrants and we continue from that point in part 24.The original standards for the installation of water...

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Access & Facilities for the Fire Service - Part 58

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 57 of this series, LWF looked at what access and facilities must be provided for the Fire Service attending a fire at a healthcare venue. In part 58, we will continue from that point by looking at the number and location of fire-fighting shafts required in those healthcare...

    Read more...

  • Facilities Management & Fire Safety - Insurers & Property Protection - Part 5

    In LWF’s blog series for those professionals who work in facilities management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at property protection and the role of the insurer. In part 4, some of the history that led to property insurance from fire was given and in part 5, we will continue looking at how different the early insurers could be from what we know today.While the...

    Read more...

  • Fire Engineering Design and Risk Assessment - Firefighting & External Water Supplies - Part 23

    In LWFs fire engineering blog series for Architects and others involved in building design, we have been looking at the subject of firefighting. In part 22, we gave information on some of the regulations and guidance documents which deal with the issue of provision of fire hydrants. In part 23, we continue from that point by looking at who should provide them and where they should be placed in relation to the building.

    Read more...

  • Fire Safety for Healthcare Premises - Access & Facilities for the Fire Service - Part 57

    In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 56 of this series, LWF spent time looking at the access required by Fire and Rescue Service vehicles to healthcare buildings not fitted with fire mains. In part 57, LWF will continue looking at those measures which should be taken to ensure the Fire Service has access to...

    Read more...

Case Studies

The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...

Read more..

General Bulletins

Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.  Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...

Read more..

Technical Bulletins

Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...

Read more..

Site map | Web development London