Lawrence Webster Forrest
Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
Lawrence Webster Forrest
Tel: +44 (0)20 8668 8663 Fax: +44 (0)20 8668 8583
With the increasing access provided for disabled occupants, greater reliance is placed on evacuation. The Disability Discrimination Act (2005) (DDA) places requirements on building owners to provide access to buildings but all too commonly their safe escape in the event of a fire has not been given the same level of consideration.
With regards to disabled evacuation procedures, the requirements will vary depending on the environment. Broadly, there are three categories for consideration: where the occupancy is fully known and can be controlled, e.g. a small office; where the occupancy can be controlled by a reception desk or similar, e.g. sports centre; where the occupancy is totally uncontrolled, e.g. a shopping centre.
Depending on your occupancy, different requirements are necessary. For example, a small office can relatively easily become fully aware of any requirements necessary for disabled staff. A bespoke Personal Emergency Escape Plan (PEEP) can be documented and implemented by all. In the instance of partially controlled occupancy, regular visitors should have a PEEP in place, with generic procedures in place for infrequent / unknown visitors. Where the likely occupancy can not be fully determined, reliance must be placed on the staff’s ability to assist occupants where necessary, once more a series of generic PEEP’s should be produced to cover some of the likely scenarios. With any incident, it is clear that pre-planning is the key to success.
Disabled evacuation procedures must formulate part of the Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) process. Within the FRA ‘people at risk’ will be identified and these will be the starting point for consultation where possible.
Specific procedures must be considered for disabled occupants, their escape is likely to be more complicated than the general population of a building. A starting point for any escape strategy should be self escape for disabled occupants. This approach is simplistic and has little potential for error as reliance is not placed on other occupants/equipment. Notwithstanding this, it is unlikely this will be a solution for all occupants, some will need assistance and this will be an outcome of their PEEP assessment.
In order to generate a realistic escape plan a number of features must be considered. The individual(s) and their specific disabilities, the fire safety features in place (existing), for example fire compartmentation to support places of temporary refuge to the fire alarm system outputs (visual beacons etc) to alert those with hearing impairments. Staff training will have to be considered along with the requirements for evacuation aids to assist persons with vertical movements where necessary. It must be noted that in the majority of instances passenger lifts do not form part of the disabled evacuation strategy unless they have been specifically designed for that purpose.
Where the PEEP assessment identifies deficiencies in the existing arrangements, it is normal to make reasonable adjustments. This does not necessarily mean that building owners have to install lifts where they aren’t already but realist adaptations should be made to assist disabled occupants in their escape. Reasonable provision is a concept considered with the DDA.
It must be noted that disabled occupants have a responsibility to co-operate, working on the principle that people are responsible for their own escape.
When considering disabled escape, a wide spectrum and disabilities must be considered as each scenario will have different requirements. Mobility impairments and wheelchair users are commonly associated with disabled occupants, however disabilities take a far broader form. Managers must consider hearing impairments, visual impairments, persons with cognitive disabilities and also the needs of persons with temporary disabilities, for example an occupant with a broken leg.
Technological advances and the ability to undertaken managed evacuations means that an acceptable solution is likely to be available for the majority of situations.
The fundamental factors in producing evacuation plans for disabled occupants is consultation, communication, effective management and understanding along with provision of physical facilities where necessary.
If you would like to know more – or would like to arrange an appointment to discuss your fire safety requirements – please call Peter Gyere, Marketing Director on 020 8668 8663.
In LWF’s fire engineering blog series for Architects and other professionals involved in building design, we have been looking at firefighting and, most recently, the provisions that should be made for the Fire Service to attend and put out a fire. In part 23, we looked at the requirements and recommendations relating to the provision of fire hydrants and we continue from that point in part 24.The original standards for the installation of water...
In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 57 of this series, LWF looked at what access and facilities must be provided for the Fire Service attending a fire at a healthcare venue. In part 58, we will continue from that point by looking at the number and location of fire-fighting shafts required in those healthcare...
In LWF’s blog series for those professionals who work in facilities management or who have an interest in or responsibility for fire safety, we have been looking at property protection and the role of the insurer. In part 4, some of the history that led to property insurance from fire was given and in part 5, we will continue looking at how different the early insurers could be from what we know today.While the...
In LWFs fire engineering blog series for Architects and others involved in building design, we have been looking at the subject of firefighting. In part 22, we gave information on some of the regulations and guidance documents which deal with the issue of provision of fire hydrants. In part 23, we continue from that point by looking at who should provide them and where they should be placed in relation to the building.
In LWFs blog series for healthcare professionals, the aim is to give information on best practice of fire safety in hospitals and other healthcare premises. In part 56 of this series, LWF spent time looking at the access required by Fire and Rescue Service vehicles to healthcare buildings not fitted with fire mains. In part 57, LWF will continue looking at those measures which should be taken to ensure the Fire Service has access to...
The Wohl Neuroscience Institute - Fire Safety, Strategy & Engineering
Key Facts: Client: King’s Clinical Neuroscience Institute Project Manager: MACE Ltd Designers: Devereux Architects/Allies and Morrison Approximate Size: 7,400m2 Description of the Project:...
Fire - The External Risk
When we consider fire safety, our focus is normally from within, what can we do to prevent the occurrence of fire and how we can limit its damage.Â Whilst this is the correct stance to take, we m...
Evacuation Modelling - Factor in Human Behaviour
Evacuation of buildings can be analyzed in different ways. Approved Document B (ADB) which provides guidance on meeting the requirements of the England and Wales Building Regulations with regard to fi...